triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: GT6 rebuild begins

To: "Barry Schwartz" <bschwart@pacbell.net>, "mcgibney" <mcgibney@attcanada.ca>
Subject: Re: GT6 rebuild begins
From: "Martin Secrest" <msecrest@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 10:15:42 -0400
Cc: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <3.0.4.32.20010929062227.00696ccc@postoffice.pacbell.net>
Funny this should come up, because I was just pondering the same issue.

As per the transmission, it would definitely seem to be "the weakest link
... goodbye!" -- but I've seen Terry Hurrell of Triumphtune quoted as saying
"we regularly put 160hp into our GT6 transmission without a problem."  I
suppose that the transmission, at best, would have to be in pristine
condition (which mine actually happens to be).

Granted, the 2.5 liter engine won't rev as high as the 2-liter, but in this
instance I think we're talking about race engines vs. street engines.
(Also, my slightly heated-up TR6 engine runs just as smoothly as that of my
GT6.)

To do the conversion, one does have to modify the sump, use the TR6 pistons
(con rods are the same) and crank, and the GT6 flywheel, I believe.  The 175
carbs can be used, I think, if the TR6 manifold is mounted upside down.  Not
a pretty sight, but I guess it works.

Barry is right -- Kastner says the 150 carbs are good to 7k rpm.

But having the 2.5 liters' low end grunt -- especially in a GT6 with the
3.27 diff -- shor' would be nice for the street and a twisty autox layout.

===
Martin Secrest
73 GT6 (driver)
72 TR6 (weekender)
Arlington, VA

"She's got a carburetor tied to the moon."



----- Original Message -----
From: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>
To: mcgibney <mcgibney@attcanada.ca>
Cc: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: GT6 rebuild begins


> >Question 1 - any thoughts on going 2.5 liters or staying with the 2.0?
> *********************
> O.K. you asked. . .In my humble opinion, not the best of ideas
> Unless your also planing to replace the tranny with a TR6 (difficult at
> best) or replace GT6 trannys quite often, then don't use a 2.5.  The added
> strain on the GT6 tranny will destroy it in short order.  It's already
> strained with the 2 liter - Not only that, the 2.5 lump is not as smooth
> running and won't rev as high as the 2 liter (no offence mind you and not
> knocking youTR6 guys but drive a good running GT6 and you'll know what I
> mean).  The 2 liter is a better all around balanced engine and it's not
> quite as simple as just changing cranks and rods.  The oil pan from the
GT6
> has to be used, but dimpled in the rod area to clear the longer stroke of
> the 2.5.  And why go to HS6s?  The stock Strombergs will breath plenty for
> this engine.  Kas Kastner got amazing horsepower from the pair of 150's
> besides, the SU's damper housing will most likely hit the bonnet at the
> front unless you make a clearance bulge because they are considerably
> taller than the Strombergs -
> bschwart@pacbell.net (San Diego)

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>