triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: not specifically triumph, but vintage related

To: "list" <triumphs@autox.team.net>, <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: not specifically triumph, but vintage related
From: "Steinman, Bill" <wsteinman@pogolaw.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 14:19:22 -0400
I agree with Lou's point.  Tragic story, and in fact, I have generally
kept my kids out of my Healey (and will keep them out of my Triumph when
I get it -- hopefully the next couple of weeks) on the open road.  

One thing I wanted to emphasize is that the Volvo driver must have been
going outrageously fast, in addition to running the stop sign.  My
father restores classics professionally, and his baby (we call it his
first child) is a 1932 Packard Victoria.  This is, by any standard, a
massive automobile.  While certainly not in any way as safe as a modern
car, this also isn't a tiny wood-bodied car.  To do any serious damage
to the Packard (even from the side), you'd have to be going pretty darn
fast.  There's just a lot of mass there.  Anyone nailing a '29 Duesie
hard enough to eject the passengers is a menace to everyone, even in a
modern car.  Of course, this point was entirely missed by the reporter
in the article.



NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential 
information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have 
received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, 
disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the 
sender that you have received this communication in error, and delete the copy 
you received.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 Disclosure:  Under U.S. Treasury regulations, we are required 
to inform you that any tax advice contained in this e-mail or any attachment 
hereto is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, to avoid penalties 
imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

Thank you. 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>