vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Period correct - definition

To: Clives_page@COMPUSERVE.COM, mcobine@earthlink.net
Subject: RE: Period correct - definition
From: Rick.Yocum@mail.sprint.com
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 16:48:28 -0400
This discussion somehow reminds me of an article written on '57 Chevy 
"Black Widows" (fuel-injected 283-powered, stripped two-doors).  The 
article noted that "of the 175 originally produced by Chevrolet, only 
approximately 450 survive."

Rick Yocum
Nova Trans Am
(Hey, why hasn't anyone cloned one of these gems?)

-----Original Message-----
From: Clives.page [mailto:Clives_page@COMPUSERVE.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 3:56 AM
To: Clives.page; mcobine
Cc: vintage-race
Subject: Period correct - definition


Message text written by "Mike Cobine"
>Out of curiosity, what do each of the groups define as period correct?<
=============================================

This is a perenial question for most car clubs.  Various "solutions" 
are adopted.   These range from the view that what was "original" 
should be definitive - ie a 1939 car must be to 1939 specification 
with 1939 parts - to the acceptance of replicas and classis for 
modified specials and hybrid cars using other makers components.

This can be taken to extreems if you switch to the word Specification 
- leading to 1920s replica Bugattis with not a single part not made in 
the 1990s being accepted as 1920s "genuine",  and 1940s MGs with 
modern 1990s steering boxes and 5 speed gearboxes being seen in 
some owners eyes to be desirable - though all the original prized 
characheristics of the cars have consequently disappeared.

Personally I want a 1920 40 or 50s car to beexactky what it was 
in its time.    But then what of older race cars whit a genuine 
and long lived in some cases, development history?.........

Regards

Clive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>