I'll get some photos on line here for sure. I
know now that it's not a Plymouth, maybe a
Maxwell?? The rear end is most distinctive, and
somebody whose into antique cars will probably
recognize it instantly. From what I've got so
far though, i know it can't be a gas roadster,
and it probably ain't going to sqeak by into
street roadster, so I might as well start
thinking and researching Modified Roadster -
-hmmmm- gonna have to change my signature block
on these letters.
--- Wester S Potter <wspotter@jps.net> wrote:
> Apparently the Plymouth badge replaced the
> Chrysler 4 cylinder after the
> 1927 model year. June 6, 1928 was the first
> production date on a Plymouth
> automobile from what we found. The '28 model
> had a Q in the identification,
> the '29 a U but aparently the cars are
> identical. The 1930 car is similar
> but the engine block has square corners, the
> '28 and'29 had rounded corners.
> Have some very accurate old car guys here who
> enjoyed doing the research.
> Wes
> ----------
> > From: V4GR@aol.com
> > To: bbutters@dmi.net,
> dwarner@electrorent.com, lsr_man@yahoo.com
> > Subject: Re: Roadster Rules
> > Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 23:40:15 EDT
> >
> >If its not a Plymouth maybe its a Maxwell
> since that's what became Plys. At
>
> >any rate it will be able to run as a street
> roadster or a modified if it is
>
> >pre 28. If it is post 27 than it can run in
> any roadster class. If it is
> >about the size of a T it will be considered
> pre. If its about the size of
> an
> >A it will be accepted post. I think you will
> find the inspectors will work
> >with you to help you have a class legal car.
> Rich Fox
> >
>
>
>
=====
Dick J - - ECTA #72
G/FCC - - ??/Roadster
(Roadster under construction
and
still seeking an identity)
|