Dan.... As Chuck mentioned from the SCCA folks.. rule book.... we be Thin
I love our rule book for it's simplicity... sure we can argue about certain
Items... but the overall rules are great in their latitude....
I do have a question about things that have been discussed in the past and
settled on that are not in the rule book... someone mentioned By-laws and
minutes or some other form of clarification about the rules.... Is there
more that I should be reading?
Keith Turk.... (happy to get through tech... that first time)
----------
> From: Daniel Warner <dwarner@electrorent.com>
> To: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com
> Cc: Land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 7:35 AM
>
> The definition in the rulebook for spoiler vrs. wings has been around for
a
> long time. Page 38, item h, 2nd sentence refers to single aero surface.
> Generally a single surface device is air flow over the top, a spoiler
with
> air flow over the top and bottom is defined as a wing by the SCTA-BNI.
Some
> aero people may disagree in this area, however, to keep it simple this is
> the way the SCTA sees it.
>
> On a production car with a spoiler/wing if the device is raised from the
> body it is defined as a wing also.
>
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com <dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com>
> To: dwarner@electrorent.com <dwarner@electrorent.com>;
> Land-speed@autox.team.net <Land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Date: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 12:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>
>
> >hi dan, thanks for the compliment, it was a hell of alot of work to
design
> >and build it. on the spoiler, should i take it that if i say why i
think
> >it fully meets the requirements of the 98 and 99 scta rules ( i fabbed
it
> >myself when the 98 rules were applicable) that the 2000 rules will be
> >deliberately modified to send this spoiler to the scrapyard ? wow- i
dont
> >know how to comment
> >
> >doug@black radon engineering
> >
> >
>
|