Am I missing something, with respect to the
effect of fuel loss. I dont see 1-2 gallon fuel
loss weight having an appreciable effect on
traction, especially in contrast to the
change in aerodynamic forces throughout the
run.
I can see the moveable weight transfer aid
with respect to downforce changes, possibly.
Anyone figured the force imparted by the exiting
exhaust gas from a pipe? directing the exhaust
straight up nets down force, but messes with the
airstream, probably something to be had their
I believe Vesco's turbine exhaust exits straight up
netting downforce, not sure of the effect on his
aero numbers
Joe :)
Dan Warner wrote:
> Does ballast have to be "fixed" in a LSR car? Could you use a onboard weight
> transfer system? I'm thinking of a very small version of the weight sled you
> see at tractor pulls. This could compensate for lost fuel weight during a
> run
> *****************************************************************************
> ************
> The current rulebook states that ballast must be fixed. If you can demonstate
> a safe mounting for movable ballast I am sure it will be looked at by the tech
> people.
>
> Why don't you place the fuel in the middle of the car where burn off will have
> less of an effect? The heavy stuff, water tanks, oil tank, etc. could be
> placed around the chassis to create the fore/aft balance you want.
>
> D Warner
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe land-speed
///
///
|