land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Sreamliner question.

To: "paul bland" <paul.blandavon@btinternet.com>
Subject: RE: Sreamliner question.
From: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:08:39 -0600
Paul;

I think that testing different shapes will be the only way to get a
definitive answer to that question. 

Regards, Neil    Tucson, AZ  

.....where it was 0 degrees C this morning--- yes, it does get cold in
the desert! It was 23F Monday morning.




-----Original Message-----
From: paul bland [mailto:paul.blandavon@btinternet.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:59 AM
To: Albaugh, Neil
Cc: Clay, Dale; lsr
Subject: Re: Sreamliner question.

I've been trying to decide how to bring the rear most part of the
bodywork
to a conclusion, given the need for tubes for chutes/exhaust......... it
isn't possible to bring the bodywork totally to a point unless I mould
in
the tubes afterwards. So.... do I do this or employ the so called "Kamm
effect" my limited knowledge (far too limited!) suggests only wind
tunnel
testing will show the answer, have to wait and see.
Cheers, Paul. In the UK where it was 3 degrees C when I opened up this
morning.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
To: <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; <drmayf@teknett.com>;
<land-speed@Autox.Team.Net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:26 PM
Subject: RE: Sreamliner question.


> Dr Kamm studied this extensively and concluded that if it wasn't
> possible to carry the streamlined body shape all the way to a point
then
> it was better to chop off the tail. I suppose he had some conclusions
as
> to where that tradeoff occurred but I don't have a copy of his paper
so
> I don't know any details; it was probably in German anyway.
>
> Regards, Neil    Tucson, AZ






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>