mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

FW: MG Logo infringement

To: MG <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: FW: MG Logo infringement
From: "REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER" <CREICHLE@nsc.msmail.miami.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 10:20:00 -0800 (PST)

 ----------
From: REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER
To: mgs-owner
Subject: Re: MG Logo infringement
Date: Friday,November 10,1995 10:12AM

A company can lose their trademark if they do not protect it from being used 
unofficially. Once it becomes common language, like people recognizing the 
octagon to mean any british car or repair shop, they have lost the rights 
and others may use it freely or even assume it as their own trademark. 
Common cases like this are Kleenex, Asparine, Xerox, even McDonalds lost 
their golden arches in, I believe, South Africa because they failed to 
protect them. Jeep is fighting right now to protect the trademark but it is 
probably too late. Jeep has become a common name.

Perhaps they are just trying to preserve the trademark to introduce new 
products in the future. After 15 years it may be too late, that's why they 
are flexing their muscle a little. As long as you are not using their 
trademark for your own business, I wouldn't worry, unless of course if you 
would like to take them to court and contest their ownership. You could 
claim that they abandoned the trademark in the US and failed to protect 
it...

Chris
 ----------
From: mgs-owner
To: Andrew Mace; TATERRY
Cc: British-Cars-Pre-War; mgs
Subject: Re: MG Logo infringement
Date: Thursday,November 09,1995 6:34PM


I also wonder if the trademark is lost through the decades of non
enforcement.
How many repair shops in every area use Mercedes and Jaguar etc. logos on
their
signs to show what repairs they make?
For a company not interested in bring the new MG into the states, the sudden 

protection of the logo seems odd. Will they sue everyone?

Mike Leckstein
>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>