| To: | mgs@Autox.Team.Net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MG gas mileage |
| From: | rdonahue@holli.com (Robert J. Donahue) |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Jun 1997 23:25:49 -0600 (MDT) |
>EMILY COWEN wrote: >> The again, why not get into direct injection?? Cutting edge >> technology with REAL performance/efficiency gains, with the same amount >> of grunt work on your part. > > Agreed that direct injection is better in about every way, >but the grunt work is a bit more. > Yeah, but SU's are way cooler looking and original! Bob Donahue, Still Stuck in the '50s rdonahue@holli.com 53 MG-TD #17639 under DIY restoration, NEMGTR #11470 71 MGB still in shop, 17 months and counting |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Paint choices, Robert J. Donahue |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re[2]: MG gas mileage, Ken Roach |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MG gas mileage, Robert J. Donahue |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: MG gas mileage, Ken Roach |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |