mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: aftermarket air-cleaner assemblies

To: gofastmg@juno.com
Subject: Re: aftermarket air-cleaner assemblies
From: miker15@juno.com (michael j robson)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 20:46:42 EST
On Sun, 18 Jan 1998 17:37:40 EST gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison)
writes:
>
>On Sat, 17 Jan 1998 23:36:59 -0500 Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca> 
>writes:
>>  I'm not sure I would agree with this.

>>  Obviously, improvement to both systems is important. The best
>>triple webers will not really pay off with a stock exhaust
>>and stock cat.
>>
>>  However, I can't see how the intake and exhaust could be
>>so tied. They aren't part of the same system, like the cat
>>and the muffler which can be matched for best performance. As
>>well, they don't handle the same air flow anyways, since a lot
>>more gas comes out of the exhaust than is drawn into
>>the intake.
>>
> Honeymoon's over Trevor, I'll dis agree with you here
>  The exhaust and intake are so tied.  Simply put, what goes in, must 
>come out.
> If you increase the intake volume (increase volumetric effeciencey), 
>and nothing to the exhaust, the resulting intake charge will be 
>contaminated with burnt gases that cannot exit the chamber due to 
>higher exhaust pressures.  
> Result - little or no increase in performance, and possibly a 
>decrease.
> (Remember that exhaust back pressure increases with RPM, but in a 
>non-linear maner - ie, the slope of the graph curves upward.)
> Now, haveing said that, a little disclaimer. On an MGB the exhaust 
>is, in stock form, superior to the intake in flow characteristics.  So 
>a marginal improvement to  the intake side will generally result in a 
>performance increase (assuming a well thought out and viable 
>improvement), even with no exhaust modification. But a point of 
>dimishing returns quickly sets in where continued intake improvements 
>soon overwhelm the stock system ability to cope.
> At this point, an exhaust upgrage is in order.
> When planning induction improvements, one is forced to consider the 
>effect of the intake changes on the exhaust flow, if the objective is 
>to maximize the result of the improvement.
>Rick Morrison
>72 MGBGT
>74 Midget 
>
Guess we learned at the same school Rick-  and in my experience the
theory is borne out - Skips original point was that the carbs are
basically  too small but having tried all sorts of combinations its still
a question of balance (obligatory Moody Blues ref)

mike robson
69 roadster (stock filters and exhaust, had stock filters performance
exhaust)
70 BGT (K+N filters Monza exhaust)
72 roadster (pancake filters and a bloody great stainless steel pipe with
no box!)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>