Dear Max,
and other netters,
Previous argument and questions were removed:
I think the questions brought up here are relevant and I'd like to hear
some answers to them. BTW, not ALL NASA and atmospheric scientists are
completely convinced.
I'm not saying that it's ok to release R12 or that the phasing out of R12
etc. was a bad idea, I'm saying that the verdict isn't in regarding the
exact causes of either the "Ozone hole" OR "global warming".
Also, when someone presents questions regarding an hypothesis, people that
support the hypothesis in question generally attempt to answer the
questions, unless they are unfamiliar with the data supporting the
hypothesis. In that event, they are taking their position of support for
the hypothesis on Faith, not Reason.
"Never Ascribe to Malice that which can be explained by Ignorance."
John J. Peloquin
Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
|