It's not just the Gen.Xers. I don't know if I am a late "baby boomer" or
and early Gen. X, but the point is that these people are going totally
crazy. The really serious among this group would like all of us to be
using public transportation and electric mini cars. I believe that we
shouldn't have cars that are spewing vast amounts of unburned fuel, CO,
Nitrous Oxides, etc., but they shouldn't be making these sweeping
generalizations of older cars and trucks. When I lived in Las Vegas, my 68
Mustang (with numerous performance features) did better on the SMOG test
than my friends 3 year old Toyota. What can we do to stop these people?
Kevin Lake
56 GMC Suburban/napco
----------
> From: MarkNoakes@aol.com
> To: oletrucks@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [oletrucks] new possible clunker law in OR
> Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 6:05 AM
>
> This is definitely a serious change in the approach to "clunker" laws and
> definitely something we can't ignore--either from the legal side or from
the
> technical "how much emissions our trucks put out" side. Notice that this
is
> much more insidious than the TX law that someone else put on the list
> recently. Even though this new approach is starting in Oregon, expect it
to
> spread to other states.
>
> In case you haven't noticed, H**da and F**d these days are both
advertising
> that they are voluntarily beating the current emissions standards--I
doubt
> that it can be done without computer-controlled fuel injection with its
full
> array of sensors and a catalytic converter. This is a very popular theme
with
> the Gen X crowd, who for the most part have no interest in vehicles as a
> hobby. Along with having the latest safety features, this theme is also
> gaining popularity with the older population. I'll have to get used to
the
> thought of anything 1981 and older as an antique unworthy of driving
though.
> Via connections with DOE, I also believe that the EPA will be imposing
tighter
> regulations in the future as well. . .and really look out if Al Gore is
the
> next president.
>
> You guys that run antique tags, keep the miles down, and mostly show your
> truck might not have much to worry about, but I still hope to drive my
> Suburban as my primary daily driver for many years when it's done . . .
which
> is beginning to look like it may take many years years itself. Oh well,
TN
> will hopefully be the last to pick this one up.
>
> Bob Adler--You're most up on this subject. Is there anything that those
of us
> in states that aren't doing any of this yet can do?
>
> Mark Noakes
> 58/56 Suburban
> Knoxville, TN
>
> In a message dated 3/20/99 5:13:29 AM, you wrote:
>
> > From: "Mike Kluth" <mkluth@oregontrail.net>
> > Subject: Oregon Legislature
> >
> > This Bill is trying to eliminate the registrtation of a 1981 vehilce or
=
> > older "total" unless it has 1) antique tags 2)Special Interest Vehicle
=
> > designation or 3) meets certain emission requirements specified by the
=
> > DEQ. Sounds like a new approach to the clunker type laws to get rid of
=
> > all but new cars.
> > Let us all write or Email our local representative=20
> >
> > Web site to find out your local Rep.
> > http://www.leg.state.or.us/rep.html=20
> >
> > Website for Oregon House Bill 3217 & other House Bills
> >
gopher://gopher.leg.state.or.us/00/measure.dir/House_Measures/hb3200.dir/=
> > hb3217g.int%09%09%2B
> > =20
> > Status
> > HB 3217 By Representative DEVLIN -- Relating to old motor vehicles.
> > 3-18(H) First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
> > Referred to Transportation.
> >
> > Website to check the status of Oregon House Bills
> > gopher://gopher.leg.state.or.us/00/measure.dir/hsesup.txt%09%09%2B
> > >>
>
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|