tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tiger Concours Judging...

To: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>, <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Tiger Concours Judging...
From: "Jerold VanderPool" <jrv309@inreach.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:45:55 -0700
Erich:  I think that you have hit the nail right on the head.  We have 16"
wheels on our Tiger, so the ruling doesn't really affect us, but for those
who have a stock or personalized Tigers, 15" wheels and good rubber is a
must if you wish to compete. Whose idea was this anyway and what is the
reasoning behind it?  Jerry and Marlene with the Candy Apple Tiger in
Cambria.----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>
To: <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: Tiger Concours Judging...


> Dividing the tiger up into too many sub classes is neither needed or
> desireable.
> There are too few of these cars to divide up.  The Tahoe United had only 3
> cars entered in stock class.  If you had a drop dead gorgeous stock Tiger
> with every bolt and hose clamp correct, except for a dual master cylinder,
> you would win most Tiger gathering concours. You would not lose enough
> points to hurt compared to the competition. (Except in 02 in Mammoth Dale
> A's car was unbeatable)
>
> My gripe is that 15 inch diameter wheels are not allowed in Personalized
> class.
> The availability of good rubber in 13 and 14 inch is getting pathetic.
The
> size of the wheel is not as big a key to handling as the drivers skill.
> 15 inch diameter wheels were available when the Tiger was new. They were
> standard size on a TR4.  I think the line should be drawn between 15 and
16
> inch and not between 14 and 15.
>
> Erich
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <wittsend@jps.net>
> To: <tigers@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 6:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Tiger Concours Judging...
>
>
> >   As I have read through these the dividing line seems to be TOTALLY
stock
> VS stock, but modified for saftey and practical reasons. Typically the
> latter would put the car in the personalized catagory where it being
"nearly
> stock" would have to compete with cars that are.... well, more inovative.
> >   Perhaps the answer it two "personaized" catagories. Stock can stay
bone
> stock for the purist, but "personalized stock" (perhaps better called
> "practical stock") would have criteria that defines stock except for
> spacific agreed upon safety modifications. "Personal modified" would
include
> any modifications beyond those defined in "personalized stock."
> >   This gives the purist his (or her) totally stock catagory, yet
provides
> for "practical" modifications to an otherwise stock are spacifically for
> safety. Thus, the total stock catagory remains as such, but a new catagory
> is created that spacifically defines safety matters from inovative or
> performance modifications found in a typical "personalized" class.
> >
> > ____________________________
> >
> > 0
> >           B9470101
> >
> >                            0/
> > ___________________________/
> >
> > (I knew I would be able to sneek rivets into this somehow, if it
delivers
> the way it looks now) Tom
> > .

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>