6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [6pack] TR5 and TR250

To: 6Pack List <6pack@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [6pack] TR5 and TR250
From: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:12:13 -0700
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: 6pack@autox.team.net
References: <3EC02700-AD32-40F2-A3B1-4435B2CFE349@comcast.net> <1358367354.66930.YahooMailClassic@web142703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1358372076.74582.YahooMailNeo@web163505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1358447308.89445.YahooMailNeo@web163501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1D261D88-AF06-4CA3-A25C-22AC516DF6C4@comcast.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120315 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8
Ashford Little wrote:
> Hmm, which brings up another question to the uninformed (me). How did 
> the PI system meter fuel? Or why was it the higher altitudes caused 
> issues? Obviously the air gets thinner, and it didn't compensate, so 
> what did the PI lack that the carbs had to compensate for altitude?
It was simple mechanical injection - the same dose of fuel regardless of 
barometric
pressure.  So as the air got thinner, with less and less oxygen, the air 
fuel ratio gets
screwed up.

The constant depression type carbs like SUs and Strombergs would not 
raise the
pistons as much in thinner air, which limited the amount of fuel getting 
mixed in,
so they dealt with altitude changes more readily than simple PI.

mjb.

________________________________________

6pack@autox.team.net

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/6pack/mharc@autox.team.net


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>