autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SP VTEC loophole

To: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: SP VTEC loophole
From: Vince Bly <vince.bly@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 18:14:59 -0600
At 11:51 AM 11/10/99 -0500, dg50@daimlerchrysler.com wrote:


>Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>
>
> > there are too many
> > cars with computer controlled camshaft timing
> > available today.
>
>Uhh, there aren't ANY cars with "computer controlled camshaft timing" out 
>there,
>in the sense where a computer directly controls the lift/duration of the 
>valves.
>What you get is multiple camshaft profiles (normally two), with the switchover
>point between profiles computer contolled.
>
>That's a HUGE difference - a VTEC controller cannot get you any more lift or
>duration (that's controlled by the immutable, cast-in-metal profile of the
>camshafts) it can only change the RPM point where one switches from the 
>low-end
>cam to the high-end cam.
>
>It's something not really accounted for in the rules, but changing the
>switchover point is most definately NOT the equivelent of swapping out 
>camshafts
>for different profiles.
>
>DG
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
-----------------

         If anyone knows where I can buy a VTEC controller for my '93 Prelude
that_will_fit_inside_the_oem_ecu_housing, let me know; I'll buy it.

                                         Vince Bly  #49 Street Touring (R 
in '00)




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>