autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SM/2 a go for 2001

To: nxracer@mediaone.net
Subject: Re: SM/2 a go for 2001
From: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:33:43 -0500
I guess so. Consider a 944 turbo and turbo Miatas for a baseline.

Matt Murray

mattm@optonline.net

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark J. Hirt" <nxracer@mediaone.net>
To: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Cc: "Teamdotnet" <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: SM/2 a go for 2001


> Have to read up on the rules a bit. Am I correct in assuming SM2 is
> basically All 2 seat SP cars with all the SM mods?  
> 
> Matt Murray wrote:
> > 
> > Mark:
> > 
> > What would you recommend?
> > 
> > Matt Murray
> > 
> > mattm@optonline.net
> > .
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark J. Hirt" <nxracer@mediaone.net>
> > 
> > > A PAX number of .875 wow can you make it any tougher?
> > >
> > > So you actually think a SM2 car can beat AP.
> > >
> > > IMHO a PAX number of .854 or RTP number of .847 is tough enough.
> > >
> > >
> > > > > The Pax number will be .875
> > >
> > > --
> > >  Regards,
> > >
> > >  Mark J. Hirt
> 
> -- 
>  Regards,
> 
>  Mark J. Hirt
> 
>  nxracer@mediaone.net
>  http://people.ce.mediaone.net/nxracer

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>