Re: SM/2 a go for 2001

To:	<autox@autox.team.net>
Subject:	Re: SM/2 a go for 2001
From:	"Brad Cox" <COXB@tmfhs.org>
Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:56:14 -0600

and I'll consider a gutted Civic with a LSD and 200 HP from a supercharger or 
Type R motor swap.  Wait!  That's SM legal.  Make that a CRX... ;-)

-brad

>>> "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com> 03/26/01 02:44PM >>>
>I guess so. Consider a 944 turbo and turbo Miatas for a baseline.
>
>Matt Murray
>
>mattm@optonline.net 

You consider a 944 turbo, I'll consider a supercharged Z06 or Viper.

KeS
_________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Matt Murray Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Mark J. Hirt Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Matt Murray Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Mark J. Hirt Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Matt Murray RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Zahornasky Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Kevin Stevens Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Brad Cox <= RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Eric Salem Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Scot Zediker Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Murray, Matthew D. Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Dan USA RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Richard Atkins RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Mark J. Andy RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Brad Cox

Previous by Date:	Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Kevin Stevens
Next by Date:	I also drove WRX - GS rumbling (long...), Fele
Previous by Thread:	Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Kevin Stevens
Next by Thread:	RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Eric Salem
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]