Re: SM/2 a go for 2001

To:	"team.net" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject:	Re: SM/2 a go for 2001
From:	"Paul Foster" <pfoster@tampabay.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:30:58 -0500

Matt Murray wrote:

<<<I guess so. Consider a 944 turbo and turbo Miatas for a baseline.>>>

You gotta be kidding me! Consider a 2000 lb Morgan with a 600 HP V8 tengine
as a baseline...

Paul Foster

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Matt Murray Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Mark J. Hirt Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Matt Murray Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Mark J. Hirt Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Matt Murray RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Zahornasky Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Kevin Stevens Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Brad Cox RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Eric Salem Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Scot Zediker Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster <= RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Murray, Matthew D. Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Dan USA RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Richard Atkins RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Mark J. Andy RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Brad Cox RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Jeff Winchell RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Loren Williams

Previous by Date:	RE: Type R the lightest??, Stern, Ken
Next by Date:	RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster
Previous by Thread:	Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Scot Zediker
Next by Thread:	RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]