Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Coolant\s+50\/50\s+vs\.\s+100\%\s+water\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 11:32:20 -0400charset="iso-8859-1"
Somebody suggested that I'd raise my boiling point by putting coolant in. I'm running pure water in my VERY hot GT6+ right now because I am overheating and don't want to put the coolant into the envi
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00479.html (7,445 bytes)

2. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 10:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
What I understand is: + Pure water transfers heat better than a 50-50 mix of antifreeze (coolant) and water + antifreeze lowers the freezing point (duh) and raises the boiling point of water- ergo, y
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00483.html (8,980 bytes)

3. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:32:18 -0400
Coolant will indeed raise the boiling point, but if it is running hot I doubt it would be enough on it's own to change your situation. I don't recall seeing your original post or what you've already
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00484.html (8,516 bytes)

4. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 16:36:24 -0400 (EDT)
Hello all--As a lurker I will offer this as a possibility;in photo processing of black and white film years ago,a product called Photo Flow or PhotoFlo was used in the final rinse of the negative to
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00493.html (10,017 bytes)

5. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 16:16:09 -0500
Pure water transfers heat slightly more effectively than antifreeze, but it boils at, well, the boiling point -- 212 degrees F. By using antifreeze in the mix, you can raise the boiling point of the
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00498.html (9,355 bytes)

6. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 18:38:02 -0400charset="iso-8859-1"
Redline makes it...goes by the name Water Wetter. ken --Original Message-- From John or Adrienne O'Leary <aoleary at bw.edu> To: Malcolm Walker <walker05@camosun.bc.ca> Cc: Beth and Ken <BethKen@erol
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00503.html (10,767 bytes)

7. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 17:21:51 -0700
Well I have used PhotoFlo (in the darkroom) and Water Wetter (in the rad) and liked both. But WW is cheap enough (less than 8 bucks I think) that I wouldn't be tempted to try PhotoFlo to see what dev
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00511.html (8,279 bytes)

8. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 19:31:21 -0600
As professional photographer, or more importantly for this thread. One that processes a whole lot of B&W film using Kodak's "Photo-Flo 6000" as the final rinse. Take my word for it that you don't wan
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00513.html (11,138 bytes)

9. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 18:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
I could easily be wrong about the surface tension and Water Wetter relation. But, doesn't soap reduce surface tension? How about alcohol? I would guess that WW is probably an alcohol-related substanc
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00516.html (8,762 bytes)

10. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 17:58:01 EDT
<< Well I have used PhotoFlo (in the darkroom) and Water Wetter (in the rad) and liked both. But WW is cheap enough (less than 8 bucks I think) that I wouldn't be tempted to try PhotoFlo to see what
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00582.html (7,687 bytes)

11. Re: Coolant 50/50 vs. 100% water (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:52:17 EDT
After rebuilding my TR3 engine, I thought it was overheating because it was boiling over. Turns out it was alittle hot (mainly due to not being quite broken in and not having the proper sleeved t-sta
/html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00694.html (7,535 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu