Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\s+shock\s+conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\s+shock\s+conversion\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. TR6 SHOCK CONVERSION (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 97 17:00:53 +1000; I was looking at uprating the rear shocks on my TR6 and went to www.cyberbia.com/peterz/tr6/rear_shock_kit/ to see an alternate type to that sold by Moss etc. Has anyone had any experience with this; /html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01227.html (6,528 bytes)
2. RE: TR6 SHOCK CONVERSION (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 10:39:49 -0600; The address you found the image at is mine. The kit comes from British Parts Nothwest in Dayton Oregon USA. I have no experience with the kit but you can get some of the inof you are seeking from BP; /html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01248.html (7,808 bytes)
3. TR6 shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 14:03:29 -0700; Hi all, UPS strike has given me extra time to play :(. Has anyone got any experience with the Moss shock conversion kit for a TR6. I recently purchased a kit from Moss which replaces the rear lever s; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00478.html (7,242 bytes)
4. Re: TR6 shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 16:20:03 -0500 (CDT) "TR6 shock conversion" (Aug 7, 2:03pm); I just finished removing the body mounted tube shock conversion kit the DPO had installed. (for sale cheap) The bracketry was rubbing on the inside of the tire (so it was a little out of alignment).; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00479.html (8,546 bytes)
5. Re: TR6 shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 07 Aug 1997 18:02:57 -0400; Hi Jeff, William, and List, I guess it's time for me to Speak, and Reveal my ignorance; What's wrong with the lever shocks ? What advantage does a tube conversion give the car, assuming it's a `good'; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00480.html (7,572 bytes)
6. Re: TR6 shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 17:29:41 -0500 (CDT) "Re: TR6 shock conversion" (Aug 7, 6:02pm); That's what I thought I said..I have no problem with levers. Although the standard levers are noticably softer that the KYB gas tube shocks that were on there. That is why I would reccommend the upra; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00484.html (8,762 bytes)
7. Re: TR6 shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 07 Aug 1997 19:08:08 -0400; Indeed you did, sorry that I didn't acknowledge that more clearly. 8-) Although the on ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ..and if you can buy uprated levers, from Apple Hydraulic for example, then what explains the appa; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00486.html (7,845 bytes)
8. Re: TR6 shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 07 Aug 1997 18:27:02 -0700; Wanna buy a new tube shock kit? Cheap! -jimb http://www.snovalley.com/~monica/jbtr6.html; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00498.html (8,791 bytes)
9. Re: TR6 shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 09:18:31 -0500; Tom> ..and if you can buy uprated levers, from Apple Tom> Hydraulic for example, then what explains the Tom> apparent popularity of the tube conversion kits ? It Tom> looks like all the vendors have; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00555.html (8,045 bytes)
10. Re: TR6 shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 06:18:57 -0700; Hi all. I've weighed in on this topic before, so here I go again. I have been working on my own conversion design for some time now. (it's a project that moves very slowly, as, beleive it or not, I'v; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00587.html (9,964 bytes)
11. TR6 shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 12:39:39 -0400; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Snip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, UPS strike has given me extra time to play :(. Has anyone got any experience with the Moss shock conversion kit for a T; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00600.html (8,917 bytes)
12. re: TR6 Shock Conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 14:56:32 +1200; There's been a few recent posts about the rear tube shock kits which mount to the body - all of them saying this type of conversion is no good. I have one of these kits (ex-Rimmer Bros) still in the; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00645.html (7,807 bytes)
13. re: TR6 Shock Conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 11:26:21 -0500; I have had tube shocks on my 1969 TR6 for 10 years now, without a single problem. I don't know whether they are any better than good lever shocks, but they are substantially better than the worn-out; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00824.html (7,791 bytes)
14. re: TR6 Shock Conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 13:15:05 -0400; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Snip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's been a few recent posts about the rear tube shock kits which mount to the body - all of them saying this type of conversion is no good.; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00832.html (8,468 bytes)
15. re: TR6 Shock Conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:49:02 -0700; I wouldn't want to be taken as saying something GOOD about this setup, but I've had it on my daily driver for the past 11 years with no problems. If I were doing it again, though, I'd most definitely; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg01035.html (8,461 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]