Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Zenith\-Stromberg\s+Carb\s+$SINGLE$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Zenith\-Stromberg\s+Carb\s+$SINGLE$\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Zenith-Stromberg Carb (SINGLE) (score: 1): Author: moses@csra.net (Tim Moses); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 10:03:07 -0700; OK, I finally did it. I pulled my single Zenith-Stromberg Carb off my 1979 MGB. I disassembled it, cleaned everything, replaced gaskets, washers, etc. that came with the "MOSS Rebuild Kit" (For futur; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00377.html (8,393 bytes)
2. Zenith-Stromberg Carb (SINGLE) (score: 1): Author: moses@csra.net (Tim Moses); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 15:50:43 -0700; OK, I finally did it. I pulled my single Zenith-Stromberg Carb off my 1979 MGB. I disassembled it, cleaned everything, replaced gaskets, washers, etc. that came with the "MOSS Rebuild Kit" (For futur; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00426.html (8,348 bytes)
3. Re: Zenith-Stromberg Carb (SINGLE) (score: 1): Author: 007 <jmel@netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 15:31:06 -0800 (PST); We seem to be travelling in parallel universes - I just rebuilt the Zenith Carb in my 79 B & now it tries to start ( once only) - then I smell that wunderful gasoline smell - I assume the carbs floo; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00430.html (7,354 bytes)
4. Re: Zenith-Stromberg Carb (SINGLE) (score: 1): Author: "Roger Garnett" <rwg1@cornell.edu>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 14:55:04 -500; No FAQ- just an on-going dispute. Some like them, some don't. Me? I've found: -they hold less pressure, and are therefore more likely to flood in a marginal situation -The originals work fine, unless; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00450.html (8,088 bytes)
5. Re: Zenith-Stromberg Carb (SINGLE) (score: 1): Author: moses@csra.net (Tim Moses); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 14:16:46 -0700; John, Jim and anyone else who has responded to my original post concerning Zenith-Stromberg (SINGLE) Carb adjustment: For some reason, Jim Mellander's post was the first response to my original quest; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00455.html (9,668 bytes)
6. Re: Zenith-Stromberg Carb (SINGLE) (score: 1): Author: John Bartholomew <jdb70@amail.amdahl.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 96 13:38 PST; Jim, I can only reflect my experience. The principle of the Gross Jet, seems to me to be better and more reliable than the original Zenith/Stromberg design. The Gross jet uses a ball which can rotat; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00459.html (9,093 bytes)
7. Re: Zenith-Stromberg Carb (SINGLE) (score: 1): Author: thorpe@kegs.saic.com (Denise Thorpe); Date: Thu, 18 Jan 96 10:05:25 PST; Jim Mellander asked: Here's the story so far as I see it: Neither Grose jets nor the original needle and seat valve are going to affect performance. The only issue here is longevity and how likely on; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00482.html (9,362 bytes)
8. Re: Zenith-Stromberg Carb (SINGLE) (score: 1): Author: RJohn50603@aol.com; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 20:05:15 -0500; I can only speak from my own experience regarding the Grose Jet after nearly 10 years of daily driving with twin HIF SU's. I had standard needle valves for about five years. I read all the propaganda; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00495.html (7,647 bytes)
9. Re: Zenith-Stromberg Carb (SINGLE) (score: 1): Author: dcouncil@imt.net (David Councill); Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 08:28:33 -0700; I could say "ditto". Actually I find grose jets and the standard variety more even as far as which is better. Yes I have found the grose jets failing to seat on occassion - particularly when the car; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00503.html (7,928 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]