Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*clutch\s+fork\s+pins\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*clutch\s+fork\s+pins\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Clutch Fork pins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:38:07 -0600; I've replaced them. It will be really easy the next time I do it ;^). You should be able to press them out with a vice and socket. You may want to heat with a torch first. The worse case is that you; /html/triumphs/2001-03/msg01117.html (6,716 bytes)
2. clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: CarlSereda@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:36:59 EST; Sometimes you can rotate fork pins to position a new surface without buggering em up (vicegrips) That's what I did.. How do you know your throwout bearing was squealing and it wasn't the pins scrapi; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00632.html (8,134 bytes)
3. RE: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: "David Templeton" <davidt@opentext.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:45:18 -0500; The TO has a stop in the groove, where the pins go to prevent it from turning. When you hold it and spin it you can actually here the bearing a fair bit, I think the sucky part is the bearing itself; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00633.html (9,132 bytes)
4. Re: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: "Kinderlehrer" <kinderlehrer@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:01:16 -0800; I just replaced them in my TR3 clutch fork. New pins are really cheap and they are easy to replace, so why try to save ones that are bad? Bob the; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00635.html (7,823 bytes)
5. Re: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: CarlSereda@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:49:17 EST; I'm not 'trying to save ones that are bad' I'm simply using the other 3/4 of untouched surface to get more value from the; already installed, postage free, no waiting, no new costs, no drilling, no p; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00636.html (7,728 bytes)
6. RE: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: "David Templeton" <davidt@opentext.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:00:02 -0500; I don't see any listing at spitbits for pins http://www.spitbits.com/gt6-gearbox-exterior.htm And the clutch sleeve has a stop on it to prevent it from rotating. I suspect that it has the bearing pre; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00637.html (8,894 bytes)
7. Re: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: CarlSereda@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:47:41 EST; I forgot for a moment you have a Spitfire not a TR.. There is a good picture of the TR fork 'pins' at Moss site: www.mossmotors.com/Shop/ViewProducts.aspx?PlateIndexID=29130 If your Spit fork looks; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00641.html (8,326 bytes)
8. Re: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: "Kinderlehrer" <kinderlehrer@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:44:42 -0800; If they are the same as the TR3, I don't think they are really press fit. I removed the old ines by grinding the back side until it was flush and then knocking them out with a hammer and a punch. A D; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00642.html (8,902 bytes)
9. Re: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: "Graham Stretch" <technical-iwnet@wight365.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:53:23 -0000; Hi David I have in the past left the new bearing in a tub of 90 wt oil overnight to allow some oil to seep in when the new bearing sounded dry out of the box. Graham.; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00643.html (7,808 bytes)
10. RE: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: "David Templeton" <davidt@opentext.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:11:45 -0500; Now that sounds like good advice, thanks I will do that on the next one David overnight to box.; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00644.html (7,495 bytes)
11. Re: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: "WebmasterRick" <WebmasterRick@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:59:14 -0600; <<I forgot for a moment you have a Spitfire not a TR..>> That is the WORST "slam" I have heard in DECADES, Carl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -:) Rick; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00653.html (7,373 bytes)
12. Re: clutch fork pins (score: 1): Author: CarlSereda@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:30:11 EST; hmm - sorry - I don't get it. No slam intended.. '63 TR4 since '74 <<I forgot for a moment you have a Spitfire not a TR..>> That is the WORST "slam" I have heard in DECADES, Carl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!; /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00660.html (7,346 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]