Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sandblasting\s+equipment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sandblasting\s+equipment\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: "Terry Smith" <terryrs@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 09:05:28 -0500; In addition to the TR3A restoration project, I have a '59 Case 30 HP tractor, firewood trailer, snow removal equipment, and other 'outside' equipment that are in advanced need of sandblasting and re; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00608.html (8,438 bytes)
2. Re: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@razzolink.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 06:55:22 -0800; Definitely. I has a siphon and always wished I could say it sucked big time but I spent a lot of time jiggling the supply to try to get sand to flow better into the inlet. YES, breathing gear. Silic; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00612.html (8,032 bytes)
3. Re: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: BearTranserv@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:04:09 EST; Pressure blasting is preferred over siphon. Two stage compressor, minimum 6 to 7 horsepower, somewhere between 60 and 90 gallons? To this, I add sandblasting paraphenalia, including a gun, special no; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00614.html (8,849 bytes)
4. re: Sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: "Martin Sukey" <mjsukey@eriecoast.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:34:58 -0500; In line with the sandblasting post going on in the Triumph list let me toss out another question. I have a TR4 tub that I want to strip down some day. I know the some of the professional blasting sho; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00616.html (8,303 bytes)
5. Re: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: "Terry Smith" <terryrs@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:55:29 -0500; Thank you, everyone, for your replies on sandblasting. Any suggestions on products and where to buy them? Terry; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00619.html (9,393 bytes)
6. RE: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 09:13:51 -0800; Although the situation has improved somewhat recently, it's still imprudent to use "horsepower" as an indicator of compressor size. Look at the CFM rating instead (but see below). Don't know the bra; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00622.html (9,496 bytes)
7. RE: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 09:22:59 -0800; My HD occasionally carries a "big enough" compressor. The real problem is that you cannot run a decent sized compressor on a 110v service, they simply need too much power. In reality, a standard 110; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00623.html (8,466 bytes)
8. Re: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: "Terry Smith" <terryrs@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:23:10 -0500; I was especially hoping you would respond, Randall. Thank you. Terry; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00624.html (10,144 bytes)
9. Re: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: ZinkZ10C@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:43:05 EST; << Actually, I need all of it, including the compressor. I'll be doing large projects (like the 4x8 trailer), and small ones, like TR steel wheels. >> For the large jobs, consider renting a large gas; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00654.html (8,266 bytes)
10. Re: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: AMfoto1@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:52:06 EST; Hi Terry, To your shopping list I'd add a hood and suit to keep the sand away from your bod, and heavy rubber gloves to protect your hands. A respirator or quality dust mask is a good idea, too. Yes,; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00656.html (10,092 bytes)
11. Re: Sandblasting Equipment (score: 1): Author: "Heglund, Davis (MN17)" <davis.heglund@honeywell.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:24:00 -0700; Bought my compressor and blasting pot a couple years ago. 60 gal, 5hp 220V, 11cfm@90psi, and wished I'd gone bigger. For big jobs, like body panels, it can't keep up with the continuous use, and the; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00684.html (8,663 bytes)
12. Re: Sandblasting Equipment (score: 1): Author: LaJoMor@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:44:28 EST; You and several others have mentioned Black Beauty blasting media. Is it available from a common source? Thanks.... Larry M CD5182L; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00689.html (7,803 bytes)
13. RE: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: "Tobin, Greg" <Greg.Tobin@trizetto.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:05:52 -0700; or Why not use regular sand? I ask, as I live somewhat near the middle of nowhere, and have done sandblasting outside, where the retention of the media (filtered playground sand) isn't an issue. Asi; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00714.html (8,167 bytes)
14. RE: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:09:10 -0800; I'd be surprised if your mask will stop silica particles of the size that cause silicosis (0.5 to 10 microns), unless it's either an electrostatic or HEPA filter. Paint droplets are far larger. Pers; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00720.html (8,004 bytes)
15. RE: sandblasting equipment (score: 1): Author: "Tobin, Greg" <Greg.Tobin@trizetto.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:01:00 -0700; I didn't realize the particles were that much smaller- and no , my filters aren't HEPA so I'm thinking you right, they won't stop the particles, and no doubt being outside really isn't going to help; /html/triumphs/2005-02/msg00838.html (8,164 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]