>If I understand the literature right, the S/R is essentially ford's 'trunk
>kit' for SS racing, don't normal cars (like civic's and SE-R's) with not
>quite so readily available, but SCCA club racing approved trunk kits get
>bumped into their respective SP classes?(Per fast track within the last 6
>mos.)
++++=========================
Well, in my opinion, the S/R differs from SCCA "trunk kit" cars in that the
ZX-2 S/R is/will be available through a retail deal just as the Neon ACRs
are, were, are, oh whatever. (Although, I still don't think that San Diego
only dealerships qualify as "retail sales outlets in the United States" per
the Stock Class rules.
>What would make the ford different, it's resemblance to the ACR packages?
>Although I have to admit another affordable, solo equipped car can not be a
>bad thing to have in the marketplace.
=================================
I vote that the S/R, if attainable from outside San Diego, should be treated
the same as other factory developed and built "race" cars like the ACRs.
Ans as long as they will be orderable through Ford dealerships across the
nation, not just in San Diego, California.
Are ya understanding my "San Diego" point yet?
Nothing against California, er, oh wait, nevermind. Everything against
California. Come on San Andreas, daddy needs some beach front property in
Arizona. ;^)
See you on course.
Eric Linnhoff in KC
#69DS TLS #13
'98 Neon R/T
<eric10mm@qni.com>
Mustang Sally,
You better slow your Mustang down.
============================
"Mustang Sally" by Wilson Pickett
|