Hello again Bill
Oops, well it seems my brain is running too fast towards this weekend.I did
indeed ,as just pointed out, read looser as loser.
Yes as I remember, ST was supposed to entice the 20-something crowd who
were doing street mods to their car.
I'd like to see sportscars included in ST. While we don't run ST here in
San Diego, we do run our local equivalent of Improved Street & Street
Modified classes. IS has 3 classes, based on engine size & does not exclude
cars based on whether or not they're sedans, etc.
Maybe it would help to have clarification when a new class is started to
the effect that the new class is for local regional events & not Nationals.
However, I do see a need for ST.
Judy {:>}
At 01:16 PM 6/18/99 -0500, Bill Fuhrmann wrote:
>> ST was created. Drivers gave it a try. As they liked driving in the class,
>> they began to invest in more time & money to prep their car. Seems this
>> is also the case with other SCCA classes as people gravitate towards the
>> class they're comfortable in.
>>
>> Now after driving the car & enjoying it for a while , maybe the thought
>> crops up about going to Nationals. Lo & behold now ST drivers are told
>> they'll be bumped & will have to run in the SP classes.
>
>Wasn't the push for ST based on the idea of a set of consistent "looser"
>local rules to let people bring their street cars out to play and have fun?
>
>
>
>
|