Re: ProSolo, Spectators, TV, et al.

[Rex Tener <rex_tener@yahoo.com>]

At 10:08 AM 6/26/2000 -0500, Bradley Lamont wrote:
>At 09:22 AM 6/26/00, dg50@daimlerchrysler.com said:
> >1) The ProSolo format is much more visably exciting from a spectator point
> >of view. It's also easier to follow, once you get to the Challenge portion
> >- 2 cars go out, one car returns. Just like drag racing.

>ProSolo (since you want to focus on it, instead of Solo) is not.  You have
>to add 2 times together.  You have to pay attention to both sides to know
>who wins.  This adds a level of complexity that spectators may not care for.

This is easy to fix, and I am surprised Howard has not already done 
it.  After the first side is complete, the trees are adjusted to factor in 
the "index" and the difference between the first side times.  On the second 
side, whomever crosses the finish line first is the winner.

Just like drag racing...


--
Rex Tener
rex_tener@yahoo.com
1995 BMW M3, SCCA SFR Solo II A-Stock #139


__________________________________________________