Yes, now someone just needs to do it. I would galdly volunteer to drive it
if someone wants to build it. Hehehe.
At 11:12 AM 6/30/00 -0600, Dave Kizerian wrote:
>OK, so building an older Civic Hatchback up with an engine swap and a
>Super/Turbocharger and it wont become "the car to have"?!?
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <reddog_es22@juno.com>
>To: <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
>Cc: <autox@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 10:07 AM
>Subject: Re: new to list
>
>
>> Picture this... Heath McMillan's CRX with a SUPERCHARGER! That would be a
>> really tough combination to beat. One of the major premises of SM (the
>> way I've always seen it) is that there are many different cars that can
>> be competitive. Throw in a car that light with a lot of horsepower and it
>> will become the "car to have." Just my opinion, YMMV.
>>
>> Scott Sawyer, HS 22
>> Team Underdog Racing, Underdog F&C
>> SCCA
>> http://www.teamunderdog.com
>>
>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:38:43 -0400 "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
>> writes:
>> > It does sound like a really silly rule..
>> >
>> > "lets allow almost unlimited mods as long as you have somthing
>> > resembling a
>> > rear seat, ummm I mean HAD a rear seat because you are allowed to
>> > remove
>> > them, I mean except porsche cars, they might be faster then a well
>> > prepaired
>> > eclipse, and they have a back seat, oh no not ANY porsches not even
>> > the
>> > sedate 924's that's right they are MUCH sportier then a supra or
>> > eclipse..
>> > Oh yea and we will allow RX7 2+2 but only if they don't upset the
>> > class.."
>> >
>> > ummm ok.. Yuck Yuck, Now where is the turnup truck I just fell off
>> > of?
>> >
>> > want to explain the logic behind that? please!
>> > I understand the rule just not why...
>> >
>> >
>> > PS. I love the rest of SM just not the silly exclusions..
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>>
>
>
>
|