ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: Miata classification question.

To: "ba-autox" <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Fw: Miata classification question.
From: "Charles Cox" <charles@coastalbay.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 05:32:00 -0800
Didn't realize they already approved it...then no argument...can update and
back date...

Charles
mailto:charles@coastalbay.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>
> To: "Charles Cox" <charles@coastalbay.com>
> Cc: "ba-autox" <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Miata classification question.
>
>
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:25:10PM -0800, Charles Cox wrote:
> > > I'd also be concerned about 3.4 and the SEB excluding this model as a
> > > limited availability option package...which would make the
> update/backdate
> > > thing moot.
> >
> > The latest FasTrack says that the SEB/SAC/whatever has ruled that the
> > Club Sport is an options package and is eligible for stock class.
> >
> > > There also may be a problem with 14.1.C.  This configuration is not
> > > standard from the model it was considered taken from...they are
talking
> > > about building 50 cars with this configuration (maybe more). You can't
> order
> > > the car with this modification but have to order one of the special
made
> > > cars configured that way and have to be a member of the support
program
> to
> > > buy one. One could possibly argue these points.
> >
> > It will be available to anyone.  SCCA members, Team Suppport members,
> > and Miata Club (don't know which one, MOC or MCA) get to order theirs
> > before it is opened up to everyone else.  It may actually be open to
> > everyone by now.
> >
> > > Oh, I remember where I read it...for SM2...18.1.F.  I might have
problem
> > > running the Miata in SM(2) with the roof delete due to this one
stating
> > > ..."firewall, roof, doors"..."must remain stock".  I knew I saw it
> > > somewhere.
> >
> > Of course, this is the Solo2 rules definition of "stock", and since SM
> > inherits its default rules from CSP, I think that update/backdate
> > applies the same way to both.  I can't imagine being allowed to do it
> > in CSP but not SM2.
> >
> > --
> >
> > john@idsfa.net                                              John Stimson
> > http://www.idsfa.net/~john/                              HMC Physics '94

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>