Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :)

tigers

Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :)

To:	HW200@AOL.COM
Subject:	Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :)
From:	Harold Hartsell <Hartsell@thegrid.net>
Date:	Wed, 08 Jan 1997 14:58:03 -0800

HW200@AOL.COM wrote:
> 
> I have a Tiger also produced late in 1966. It has a 260, (2589) intermittent
> manufacturing between 260's and 289's is more than a legend, it's a farce.
> Not only
> would a manufacturer be scrambling with inefficiency but so would the
> eventual consumer who was told by the manufacturer they actually DID have a
> 260 under the hood for that year. 

And Rootes wasn't scrambling with inefficiency? (grin)

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), BunkyR Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), HW200 Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Keith Bradshaw Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Harold Hartsell <= Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), HW200 Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), LeBrun Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Keith Bradshaw RE: Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Jay Laifman Re: Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), HW200 Re: Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), HW200 Re: Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), HW200 Re: Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), BunkyR Re: Re: Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Jay Laifman Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Frank Marrone

Previous by Date:	Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Keith Bradshaw
Next by Date:	Re: Electronic Ignition, JEFF_CARTER
Previous by Thread:	Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Keith Bradshaw
Next by Thread:	Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), HW200
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]