Hey dweeb,
I was just clarifying a quote in another message.
I don't appreciate your sarcasim. Get the hell of my back.
I don't disagree. I was just suprised that I thought I read about a
change in policy.
You jump everybody?
Regards,
Jim
---JAN HARDE <harde@cyberesc.net> wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> Hmmmmm, let me see---we authenticate cars....for what purpose....to
know
> which ones are not real???
> and if we know the ones that are not?? should people not know ??
every other
> club does!!!
>
> Ahhhhhh Daaahhhh why else authenticate, certainly not for the TAC
people to
> play a solitaire game of let's guess the ALGER...(good game by the
way for
> the fall line up on ABC)..
> We want to HELP one another make educated and informed decisions on
the
> purchase of a car, with cars selling @ $ 30K++ and in a few years who
> knows?? Let's find a way to get behind the TAC, get inspectors all
over the
> planet, and inspectors that will go out to check out a car for a
prospective
> buyer, sort of like the Shelby club has done for years...TEAM work
....
> With some 7000 cars built, and around 3 or only 400 TAC'ed so far,
and most
> in CA, the process as it is going will be done TAC'ing all the cars
in 2127,
> and my great great grandson will be at the finale party, to be held
on the
> Moon, the cite of the 2127 SUNI XXXVIII.
>
> See Ya' Jan....
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
> To: tigers@autox.team.net <tigers@autox.team.net>
> Date: Sunday, August 23, 1998 3:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Fraud?
>
>
> >With regard to:
> >
> >"I have been told that the car has been inspected by certified
> >"experts"(not Norm) and the physical evidence clearly shows that Norm
> >is correct.
> >So, Henry, I believe your "innocent until proven guilty"
> >philosophy......."
> >
> >I thought that the ONLY thing that TAC noted was cars that were, in
> >thier opinion, authentic. How is it then, that in this case, that
TAC
> >is confirming a conversion? Has the TAC policy changed? This is a
> >big step as far as liabilities are concerned.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Jim
> >B9470139
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|