triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VTR National

To: "Andrew Mace" <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>, "Tom Gentry" <TGENTR@wgc.woodward.com>
Subject: Re: VTR National
From: "Bob Kramer" <rgk@flash.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 18:44:08 -0500
Cc: "'triumphs'" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
While talking about Newton's book, the TR250 section is filled with
incorrect information such as a picture of a 250 with dual Monzas defined
as one sure way to tell a TR250 and a TR4A apart, and a TR6 reflective top
pictured to be one of the few surviving original 250 tops. And that's just
the pictures. The car they chose to photograph had been liberally spiced up
with TR6 (steering wheel and seats) and aftermarket parts, and passed it
off as representative of the original car. 

Bob Kramer, Austin TX
Hill Country Triumph Club
TR6x3, TR250 x3, TR3A vintage race
rgk@flash.net

----------
> From: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>
> To: Tom Gentry <TGENTR@wgc.woodward.com>
> Cc: 'triumphs' <triumphs@autox.team.net>
> Subject: RE: VTR National
> Date: Thursday, July 17, 1997 12:24 PM
> 
> On Thu, 17 Jul 1997, Tom Gentry  wrote:
> 
> > "Mr. Mike" Passaretti wrote:
> > >>Don't the cars have to sign a waiver?  Or at least the owners?
> > 
> > Assuming the cars were in a public place and the pictures were taken
> > from public property no release is necessary for any use.  Otherwise,
> > the need for a release depends on the use of the pictures, for instance
> > advertising would require a release, journalism would not.
> 
> My hope, considering that a similar situation arose at the 1983 VTR 
> Convention in Long Island, is that the photographer (along with whoever
else 
> works on this book) knows his or her subject well enough to properly 
> describe whatever photos are used. Those familiar with Newton's Triumph 
> Guide have seen a number of photos in same that were taken at the VTR 
> National in 1983. Unfortunately, some of the shots used led to some very 
> misleading information about Triumphs. Most notable are a Spitfire that
is 
> obviously a blend of 1969 and 1970 models and a photograph of the "pseudo

> Rostyle" wheelcover that, in fact, is an aftermarket item that looks even

> worse than do the originals (which, BTW, I am saving to reuse on my own 
> GT6+ someday because I think they're cool :-) ).
> 
> --Andy
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * Andrew Mace, President and                *
> *   10/Herald/Vitesse (Sports 6) Consultant *
> * Vintage Triumph Register                  *
> * amace@unix2.nysed.gov                     *
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>