triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Off topic....for sure!

To: "'Don Malling'" <dmallin@attglobal.net>, <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Off topic....for sure!
From: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:24:00 -0700
See the next to last statement of my message!

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Malling [mailto:dmallin@attglobal.net] 
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 10:19 AM
To: Joe Curry; triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Off topic....for sure!

Huh..... ?

I ran OS/2 on PC clones. Built thm myself from the internet. Never owned
a PS/2 machine.

Don Malling

Joe Curry wrote:
> Not to be defensive of Microsoft, but the OS2 thing was aimed at
trying
> to recapture market share that IBM lost to Microsoft.  
> 
> OS2 was a complete departure from the Windows environment because IBM
> wanted to sever the link so that people would have to buy IBM hardware
> to use the "Advanced" operating system.  
> 
> On the other hand, Microsoft did not want to leave anybody behind so
> they migrated the 16 bit system gradually with hooks in the 32 bit
> systems back to DOS and 16 bit versions of Windows.  
> 
> By opening the architecture of their PC's IBM created a huge market by
> allowing all the clone makers to copy their system's functionality.
> That was necessary to counteract the growing Apple inertia.  It was
> successful but IBM saw that they could not continue to grow their
> business as they wanted to and let the clone makers continue to erode
> their market share.  So they designed the PS2 archetecture and did not
> share it the way they did in the original PC.  The release of OS2 was
> timed to coincide with the release of the PS2 archetecture.  They also
> wrote the code so that it would run on clones but not as effectively
as
> on their PS2.  To their dismay, neither the PS2 or OS2 products took
off
> they way they intended.
> 
> Joe




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>