vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IN RE: Mechanical Failures

To: WSpohn4@aol.com
Subject: Re: IN RE: Mechanical Failures
From: "John A. Rollins" <nobozos@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 21:23:24 -0800
You can tell the racing season is over "up North"...

The preparation guidelines we use in the Florida Regions Vintage Program state 
that the car may 
be prepared using any modifications that would have or could have been made 
legally in the year 
of manufacture.  We use the SCCA PCS (production car specifications) to 
determine legality.  
However, if the car was actually raced during the period (pre '73) then it may 
run in any of the 
configurations actually run prior to 1973.  Such configurations must be 
substantiated with the 
appropriate documentation.

In general, we don't have many problems in our group.  The prize money sucks 
but the people are 
great!  When there are questionable items, they are brought to the owner's 
attention and, if 
deemed inappropriate for our rules, they are given a reasonable amount of time 
to correct the 
item while they continue to participate in our events.  Sometimes the 
corrections are made and 
other times the owner decides he/she wants to do more performance enhancements 
and moves on to 
events run by an organizer allowing this (I did NOT say HSR...)!  There is 
plenty of room for 
all groups - you just have to decide who you want to run with...

Off my soapbox and hot on the trail of the Ryder trucks headed to Tallahassee...

*8o)

WSpohn4@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 01/12/00 9:42:46 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> S800Racer@aol.com writes:
> 
> > The real problems that exist in vintage racing are the cars that
> > regularly compete in vintage events with a variety of non-period
> > performance
> > modifications.  They are not hybrid BMC/Chevys but they are also not
> > faithful
> > to a set of rules from the appropriate period.
> >
> >
> 
> The question is what the appropriate period is. You have actual race cars out
> there with long racing histories that started after the "appropriate period".
> 
> My MGA, for instance, was turned into a race car by me in 1973. It was at
> that point about as old as my daily driver 1988 Fiero is today. For many
> years I was the only MGA racing in Canada (when I took it to the Canadian
> run-offs one year, they were astounded to see it).
> 
> So - should I be able to race it as I could have done 'in period' back when I
> was 10 years old, or as it raced for 3 decades? Fortunately in my case, I
> never installed grotty great flared fenders or any such, so it really isn't
> an issue, but many cars were  not hitting the track, except in the hands of
> the factory or the well-heeled, until a decade after they were built, and
> many had long and distinguished careers thereafter. They were developed to
> the rules that applied when they were raced, not when they were manufactured.
> 
> Obviously you don't want a pack of vintage iron prepared to current SCCA
> spec, but my point is that there should be some period, ending later than the
> actual production date of the car in question, to which they would be allowed
> to prepare.
> 
> Or alternatively, you COULD limit all the newly built race cars to the period
> of the car, and only cars that were actually prepared and raced before, say,
> 1980 or some such, with verifiable history, could use the later rules. That
> doesn't seem an entirely satisfactory answer either.
> 
> Bill

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>