[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Supercharger

To: "David Councill" <>,
Subject: RE: Supercharger
From: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 15:19:19 -0700
Interesting perspective.  I would consider a 4 hour kit install less of
a mod than a .060 overbore.  The overbore is much harder to reverse... 
(If you ever chose too, but then again, you can't see the overbore can

On Sat, 09 Feb 2002 13:49:58 -0500, Jerry Erbesfield wrote:

>I personally believe increasing the bore as much as possible is very
>important. There is NO better or more cost effective way of boosting
>performance, which is so needed on our MG's and that doesn't affect the
>vehicle remaining "stock" (like wouldn't be the case with adding a
>supercharger). If you were to try the .060 overbore and then discover that
>you would have to "sleeve" the cylinders to successfully achieve it, that
>wouldn't be such a bad thing, IF the person you have doing the work is
>capable. The cost for sleeving is affordable (at least it was through my

Andrew Lundgren

/// mailing list
///  or try

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>