> > Personally, I am willing to look at any alternative to R-134a. In
> my
> > personal research on the ozone depletion/CFC issue, I uncovered a
> few
> > facts about R134-a that have been largely suppressed:
> > 1. It is less efficient than r12, requiring half again as much
> volume in
> > the system to do the same job. a retrofit will result in less
> cooling
> > than before.
> > 2. It is so highly corrosive that the entire system will be
> destroyed
> > and have to be completely replaced within five years (my local paper
>
> > recently had an article fron the AP about this very thing--after the
> ban
> > in 2000, a refrigerator will cost 50% more and be totally shot in
> five
> > years, instead of the current average of sixteen.)
> >
> > Also, my research has led me to conclude that the CFC/ozone
> depletion
> > theory is a complete fraud, and I will not support DuPont or the
> other
> > companies for their duplicity by buying r-134a.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Scott Kohl (donning Nomex)
Scott, what excatly is your research exposing the CFC/ozone
depletion fraud?
--
Roger Helman 71 TR6 CC67866L
Digimation Inc. http://deepthought.digimation.com/rogerh/
New Orleans La.
www.digimation.com
Voice. 504.468.7898
Fax. 504.468.5494
|