triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TR] de-mister hose question

To: <Dave1massey@cs.com>, <tr3driver@comcast.net>,
Subject: RE: [TR] de-mister hose question
From: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:46:09 -0400
I know, I know. I keep telling myself to just get rid of the lower units, but
something stops me from doing it. Pride goeth before a fall, or in this case
an eye-ball vent.

Cheers,

Mark


________________________________

From: Dave1massey@cs.com [mailto:Dave1massey@cs.com]
Sent: Sat 06/05/2006 8:27 PM
To: Mark Hooper; tr3driver@comcast.net; triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [TR] de-mister hose question


In a message dated 5/6/2006 4:44:20 PM Central Standard Time,
mhooper@digiscreen.ca writes:


        That helps, but I still think it's a slightly lame design. It's the 
lower
        eye-ball vents that seem to do little. I mean in really warm weather you
have
        the top down and can open the heater with the valve closed and you will 
get
        cool air by the feet. Those extra vents add a lot of weird stuff in 
behind
the
        dash and make it hell to assemble.



You can simplify your life by eliminating those and running the hose directly
to the dash vents.  That Y-piece and the short hose that has to do a tight 180
are more trouble than they are worth.  (Of course I still have mine but maybe
only because of a slight masochistic streak in me.)

Dave


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>