Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tub\s+Weight\s+\/\s+was\s+frame\s+weight\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tub\s+Weight\s+\/\s+was\s+frame\s+weight\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 12:53:29 -0400; Since we are searching for weights here does anybody know the weight of a Triumph tub? I have a TR4A project that has been stored outside and I am thinking about building some kind of framework so th; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00139.html (7,585 bytes)
2. Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:12:14 -0400; Message text written by INTERNET:MJSUKEY@cs.com Triumph tub? I have a TR4A project that has been stored outside and I am thinking about building some kind of framework so that I could remove the tub; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00141.html (8,956 bytes)
3. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:18:11 -0400; Well hot damn! I *finally* have an opportunity to contribute to the List :-) I just pulled the tub off my '63 TR4. Didn't have a chance to weight it (a bit awkward for the bathroom scales) but my son; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00145.html (8,512 bytes)
4. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:45:59 -0500; all stripped, was the I was at a TR4 lift. We put the body, sans doors, onto the frame. The body seemed lighter than the Europa body. The FRAME seemed to weigh about six times as much as the Europa; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00174.html (8,701 bytes)
5. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:40:15 -0400; Message text written by "Phil Ethier" < Suggestion: never attempt to lift a TR body with the doors removed. You run a risk of folding the body in the middle. The only thing stopping it is the rockers; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00179.html (8,355 bytes)
6. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:58:53 -0400; are doors == Just a little more friendly advice to add to this, "NEVER" lift from the front or rear, only from the sides, leave the doors on as Dave has pointed out the accordian is a musical instru; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00185.html (9,135 bytes)
7. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:45:11 -0400; Yeah. I remember disassembling a very rusty TR4 many years ago, by myself, and being able to fold up the tub simply by picking up the front part of it. Other than not hearing "Lady of Spain" while th; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00191.html (8,315 bytes)
8. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:11:36 -0400; Some might dispute that point. But then, I play banjo occasionally so what do I know? -- Jim Muller jimmuller@pop.rcn.com '80 Spitfire, '70 GT6+; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00195.html (7,833 bytes)
9. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:11:41 -0400; Message text written by "Fred Thomas" front or rear, only from the sides, leave the doors on as Dave has pointed out the accordian is a musical instrument not a T/R tub. "FT" < True. Lifting at the w; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00196.html (8,808 bytes)
10. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:19:07 -0400; True. Lifting at the wheel arches is probalby best but, if you are starting with the body along side the frame one is severly tempted to lift from the ends so as to avoid stepping over the frame. Lif; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00202.html (8,985 bytes)
11. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:42:29 -0400; == There is no disputing the fact that eating "Damson Preserves" makes for excellant piano plyers, and I seem to remember something about lost cells that leads to Triumph ownership from loss of the; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00204.html (8,563 bytes)
12. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:05:09 -0400; Message text written by INTERNET:pethier@isd.net openings. I only mentioned the lack of doors because we were talking about weight. We lifted the body by the wheel arches, off the trailer and forward; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00206.html (8,333 bytes)
13. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:02:14 -0400; Message text written by "Jim Muller" so what do I know? < You should get together with Bruce Clough from the wedge list. He plays mandolin. Then all you need is a washtub base and someone to blow on; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00207.html (7,968 bytes)
14. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:02:14 -0400; Message text written by "Jim Muller" so what do I know? < You should get together with Bruce Clough from the wedge list. He plays mandolin. Then all you need is a washtub base and someone to blow on; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00208.html (7,852 bytes)
15. Re: Tub Weight / was frame weight (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 20:20:23 -0400; I didn't point out that I'd welded angle iron across the doors and one across the cockpit. I hated to do it, as the body guy, who will have to squeeze inside, is, ah, not as slim as he used to be. :-; /html/triumphs/2003-10/msg00220.html (9,422 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]