autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends?

To: "'John Coffey'" <johncof@ibm.net>,
Subject: RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends?
From: John Steczkowski <stecz@Crossroads.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:45:39 -0500
Cool thought, so if you have 3 settings on each end, you really have 9
settings (taking into account all of the permutations).




----
John Steczkowski
Director, Server I/O
Crossroads Systems, Inc.
512-794-2742



> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Coffey [mailto:johncof@ibm.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 2:44 PM
> To: Team. Net (E-mail)
> Subject: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends?
> 
> 
> In a discussion with a local suspension guru the point was made that
> adjustable swaybars really only need to be adjusted on one 
> end, thus the
> adjustable bars that have adjusting holes on both ends really 
> only need the
> holes on one end.  The basis for this argument is that a sway 
> bar is just a
> spring with a constant rate so a 100 lbs pushing up on one 
> end will push
> down with 100 lbs on the other (assuming no preload on the bar).
> 
> Thinking about this in the context of vehicle roll (which the sway bar
> exists to control) it appears true.  A sway bar transfers 
> load from one side
> of the vehicle to the other at a constant spring rate and the 
> lever length
> of the sway bar ends would not affect the amount of load 
> transferred (again,
> we're talking about vehicle roll).  I don't think its true in 
> single wheel
> bump but that's another issue.
> 
> This was a new idea to me but it makes sense (after thinking 
> about it and
> drawing a lot of pictures).  What do you folks think?
> 
> ----------
> John Coffey
> johncof@ibm.net
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>