When this whole deal started, we simply gave no points or finishing
position with a "DNW" by the name. For some it took a few of these before it
sank in. I can thing of some very well known drivers where it took 5 DNWs!
Asking registraion to maintain a list to keep the bad apples out is not
a good idea, as the folks who run change during run groups.
Lately we've not been showing times, too (which we used to do, just so's
the offender would know where they could have finished had he/she worked.
But we've drawn a harder line at present.
Usually the offenders get the picture pretty quickly and do one of two
things: 1) don't return; or 2) return and work. Either is okay with me.
Another offense some do is to get their names checked off, and wander
away. So you really have to be a cop to keep them going in the right
direction. :)
--Pat K
----------
>From: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>
>To: Cheryl Grantz <sgrantz@peoplepc.com>
>Cc: ba autocross list <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: More DNWs
>Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2001, 1:45 PM
>
>Cheryl Grantz wrote:
>>
>>
>> So every worker sheet was compared to the results to see if the lack of
>> workers was due to some people not even signing up to work.
>>
>> Sherry
>
>People caught doing this should be penalized somehow. Maybe confiscating
>their SCCA membership card at the next event they attend(we might not be
>able to do that) or banning them for a year. I had a few doing this at
>AAS events, it only took one warning of being banned for a year and they
>didn't do it again. At least I haven't caught anyone doing it lately. If
>they get mad and don't come back, so what, SCCA doesn't need bad apples.
>Most good people will respond positively to a firm warning.
>
>Jesus
|