ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sunday's course

To: Kevin Stevens <autox@pursued-with.net>, autox
Subject: Re: Sunday's course
From: Donald R McKenna <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 12:39:59 -0700
Kevin responded to Paul:

>> p.p.s.  Let's say you're working course, and a car takes out / carries
>> off the
>> final cone in a slalom AND the pointer cone so that the workers cannot
>> safely
>> replace them before the next driver comes.  Should the course workers
>> red flag
>> the following car and give them a re-run,
> 
> Yes, though depending on the cone and what course the following driver
> takes, I've seen people decide to let it go.  It's up to the driver to
> stop and point out a displaced cone that might be erroneously charged
> to them, or that makes the course more difficult; but if the displaced
> cone alters the course for the better the course workers should stop
> runs.  The basic guide is that all cars should be competing on the same
> course.

At the risk of opening another "can-of-worms", Kevin's last sentence is why
some of us think optional direction slaloms should not be used.

        Don






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>