fot
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fot] 89MM piston question

Subject: [Fot] 89MM piston question
From: joealexandervintage at gmail.com (Joe Alexander)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:28:09 -0600
References: <CAMJWJcHsmkMuWwvt1bs3Lax-kTVTkADpdNrFiWUahJDa2r3zsg@mail.gmail.com> <1659c8fa8c2-1ebc-238b@webjas-vaa013.srv.aolmail.net> <90DC3BE5-84AA-4C92-95A5-CA7831825C2C@ponostyle.com> <2F97DC1C-07AC-48FE-8CED-E6E865D4A7DE@ponostyle.com> <002d01d44350$39bb7c20$ad327460$@gmail.com> <2CA957DD-874F-48A6-95B5-4939DA460A56@ponostyle.com> <001f01d443af$9b9a1050$d2ce30f0$@gmail.com>
Chris Marx. You are my hero. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Chris Marx via Fot <fot at autox.team.net> wrote:
> 
> I'm happy to have an engine like a steam puller. Not as fast as Marcels 
> engine, but reliable (mostly) and easy to drive.
> No need for funny HP numbers. Reliability is king in my opinion.
> 
> Cheers
> Chris
> 
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Bill <Bill at ponostyle.com> 
> Gesendet: Montag, 3. September 2018 16:40
> An: tr4racing at googlemail.com
> Cc: fot at autox. team. net <fot at autox.team.net>
> Betreff: Re: [Fot] 89MM piston question
> 
> That?s impressive. Now is you could just produce that peak torque at 10,000 
> RPM you?d have a 314HP motor. Or somehow move the torque peak to 6350 RPM 
> you?d have 200. 
> 
>> On Sep 2, 2018, at 11:34 PM, Chris Marx via Fot <fot at autox.team.net> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
> 
> http://www.fot-racing.com
> 
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/joealexandervintage at gmail.com
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>