geez
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: How much adjustment is normal?

To: <bshort@AFSinc.com>
Subject: Re: How much adjustment is normal?
From: "Steve Hudson" <shudson@io.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 11:25:48 -0500
How sensitive are the ratings to endspeed?  Is +/- 5mph good enough?
Does adjusting the individual turns effect the ratings or is it just to make
the map more accurate?
Steve Hudson


----- Original Message -----
From: Byron Short <bshort@AFSinc.com>
To: Steve Hudson <shudson@io.com>
Cc: R. John Lye <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu>; <geez@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: How much adjustment is normal?


> Steve has the adjustment method exactly right, John.  The
> fact that your map is "too straight" and the speed is too
> high both indicate that you need to go to adjustments and
> decrease end speed.  Do this until the shape of the map
> looks closer to you.  In most cases, I bet most of us use
> just this one primary adjustment.
>
> After you have the map looking close, meaning that most of
> the corners appear about right, then you can fine tune the
> map by adjusting just individual turns.  In some cases
> you'll need to do this to make the course look right, but
> please don't do it until you've done the primary adjustment
> of the end-speed above.
>
> The adjustments for endspeed DO affect your ratings.  The
> reason why is that the forward acceleration potential is
> dependent upon the speed the vehicle is moving.  As you
> adjust the end-speed, you adjust the speed throughout the
> run, and that effects ratings.  The most accurate ratings
> are with the speed correct.  This will generally result in a
> pretty good map as well.
>
> If you want to get really picky about a map, you can usually
> make it look almost exactly like the course.  Always start
> with the end speed adjustment.  Use individual turn
> adjustments only once you have the basics right with
> end-speed.
>
> Also, don't worry about calibration numbers under 250 or
> so.  So a 149 is okay.  A calibration number of 500 or 1200
> would not be okay.  Most incorrect calibration numbers are
> either around 1200 or 2400.  These numbers indicate that
> either the cube wasn't rolled onto the proper side, or it
> was rolled onto the opposite side.  Numbers from 250 down
> are believable, and numbers from 0-150 are pretty normal.
>
> --Byron



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>