In a message dated 1/25/02 2:51:26 PM, mlupynec@globalserve.net writes:
<< Annice, I hear you. So here is my short version of keeping the
record straight. >>
Mike: l believe you hear me, but you don't understand me at all. The way I
see it, you are trying to interpret what my words mean. My words mean
exactly what they say. I am not implying anything. As far as I am
concerned, you blasted me for correcting you on what a Concientions
Objector was. I really don't give a darn for your interpretation of what my
sentences meant, much less a recap of same. I'll thank you to let me speak
for myself and spare me the insult of acting as my interpreter (since you
really don't do it well at all). Secondly, your response was rude and
totally uncalled for. An on-list apology would be nice and might just
satisfy some of the antagonistic mail you've been receiving from some of my
friends and others who just thought you were out of line.
As far as going private, lacking a real on-list apology and having you stop
trying to translate my words into whatever you want them to be, I see
absolutely no reason to discuss ideologies with you on- or off-list.
Annice
1960 Bugeye (Mk. IV in disguise)
1966 Sprite Mk. III (Still in Boxes)
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets
|