On Thu, 15 Oct 1998 Cwn74@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 10/15/98 9:16:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> lang@isis.mit.edu writes:
>
> >
> > Sorry to hear about your tribulations. I had a similar problem when the DCO
> > (ME!) installed a set of T.W. _backwards_ and wound up cutting into the
> > crankshaft. Badly. The crank was trash.
> >
> Wasn't the block damaged also?
In my case - NO. The T.W. installed backwards causes very rapid wear of
the crank. The material that the T.W. shell is made from appears to be
very hard steel. That rubbing up against the crank (when you apply the
clutch) digs into the crank. My washers never fell out, but after about
10K miles, the T.W. contact surface on the crank was "dished" about .010,
maybe a bit more. I brought the crank to a crank guy and he said "toss
it". Seeing that a brand new TR6 crank costs about $179 from the big
three, I agreed and tossed it. He could have fixed it, it just would have
cost more than $179. It's the crank - why risk having it fail
But no, my block was not damaged.
My point was, I had minimal end float after the rebuild, .003 as I
recall, that end float remained at .003 to .005 for over 9000 miles. Then
I noticed some slop and it wore _very fast_. To around .060. The crank
never touched the block in my case.
> Clark
regards,
rml
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Lang Room N42-140Q | This space for rent.
Consultant MIT Computer Services |
Voice: (617)253-7438 FAX: (617)258-9535 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|