Philip Haldeman wrote :
> As a relative newcomer to the scene, including local club
> membership, I hear proud talk of "daily drivers". That's
> cool. But not TR3
> daily drivers.
Gee, Phil. Am I in your spam filter ? <g>
I understand your point, but to my mind it's a sad thing when the last few
examples of a particular car can only be found in museums. The cars were
made to be driven and enjoyed, not put on a pedestal and looked at from a
distance. But, sooner or later, due to increasing rarity, that's the way
they all wind up. Which of course, doesn't mean I don't think there should
be such cars, or that I'm not grateful to the people who put them there.
That way, I get to (partially) enjoy cars that otherwise I never would have
BTW, I own a copy of Piggott, and am quite interested in what my cars
"should be", even though I choose to make certain modifications. After all,
how else can I know exactly what is, and is not, a modification ?
As far as being opinionated about cars, that's good ! It shows you are
passionate about the subject, which is something of a prerequisite for LBC
59 TR3A daily driver