vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Replicars vs. Real ... and vs Rebuilds

To: shiples@comcast.net, anngene@bellsouth.net, vintage-race@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Replicars vs. Real ... and vs Rebuilds
From: Tombread@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:55:04 EDT
In a message dated 9/4/03 8:00:30 PM US Eastern Standard Time, 
shiples@comcast.net writes:

> Enjoy what you have and do what you enjoy.  If history is important, you 
> play
> historian.  This is an imperfect world and you either live with
> your mistakes or discard them.  Or, if you're litigious, you like the battle
> in the courtroom, the loud bark of the lawyer etc.  I doubt if that's cost
> effective.
> 

But if you pay a premium for authenticity, then authenticity you should get.  
The word "fraud" comes to mind.

Why is this any different than a Rodin copy being passed off as a one-off 
Real Thing?  Or an XK-SS rebodied as a D-Type.
  
Provenance is important in buying anything priced with a historic premium.  
It sounds like the fellow bought an homage replica but paid for the original.

Tom Butters

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/vintage-race


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>