DrMayf,
I was not suggesting that you were making any assumptions as to the
cause of failure. Just a statement for all to adhere to. I have heard
some comments about the failure of the chutes that I think were unwise.
(not specific to the list)
Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/GCC (still not unloaded and cleaned up)
DrMayf wrote:
> Tom, thanks for the reply. Glad to hear that the analyses is pretty much on
> track with regards to yank load. It is what I was trying to get everyone to
> think about. I understand that there are speed secrets that everyone wants
> to keep close to their chests, but there is no award for stopping fast or
> correctly. We should ,as a community, be sharing all knowledge with respect
> to stopping after the race is done. As to the assumptions of failure, are
> you chiding me as to the cause? Hope not because, I very clearly make it
> plain that I have not a clue as to what exactly happened. And just because
> something works one time then fails another is more reason to look at the
> high speed parachute situation...and I suspect that not much goes over you
> head...
>
> not picking on you Tom, just a good place for more soap box.
>
> mayf, the red necked ignorant desert rat in Pahrump
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
/// what is needed. It isn't that difficult, folks.
|