Re: Traction control

["bennevl" <bennevl@netzero.net>]

 Object of my message was meant to say some things might become mandatory
 just to prevent the use of traction control. Now you have ADDED cost NOT to
 use traction control.
 Bill
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "bennevl" <bennevl@netzero.net>
> To: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; "James Tone"
> <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>;
> <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 7:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Traction control
>
>
> > Ok well here is one I stumbled upon, kind of  CYA from these people. And
> > their claims of never producing a traction control  HA-HA ask them why
> their
> > programmable timing computers are illegal.
> > http://www.msdignition.com/pdf/hei_traction_control.pdf
> >
> > Bill