Re: Traction control

["John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>]

Added cost is what we are all trying to avoid.

JB
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "bennevl" <bennevl@netzero.net>
To: "Landspeed List" <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: Traction control


> Object of my message was meant to say some things might become mandatory
>  just to prevent the use of traction control. Now you have ADDED cost NOT
to
>  use traction control.
>  Bill
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "bennevl" <bennevl@netzero.net>
> > To: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; "James Tone"
> > <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>;
> > <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 7:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: Traction control
> >
> >
> > > Ok well here is one I stumbled upon, kind of  CYA from these people.
And
> > > their claims of never producing a traction control  HA-HA ask them why
> > their
> > > programmable timing computers are illegal.
> > > http://www.msdignition.com/pdf/hei_traction_control.pdf
> > >
> > > Bill