land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hot Rod/Bore,Stroke combo's

To: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>, "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>,
Subject: Re: Hot Rod/Bore,Stroke combo's
From: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 07:06:09 -0700
And that was the testing that was originally proposed. To once and for all
find the truth of rod ratio controversy by changing only the rod ratio and
leaving everything else alone. I have no doubt that if you change the ratio,
then change the heads and then change the induction then change the cam then
change...well you get the idea...you cannot determine truth by changing all
the variables at once. You just make a mess and it can't be explained.
Wspecially on something that is basically a one shot deal.

mayf

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
To: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>;
<land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 1:54 AM
Subject: RE: Hot Rod/Bore,Stroke combo's


> It might not make any difference on paper but i can promise you that if
you
> put a 6.2 rod on a 3 inch stroke engine with the same heads that worked
well
> with a 5.7 rod it won't make enough torque to pull your pants down..
> Dave
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-land-speed@autox.team.net
> > [mailto:owner-land-speed@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of DrMayf
> > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 12:58 AM
> > To: Keith Turk; land-speed@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: Hot Rod/Bore,Stroke combo's
> >
> >
> > I was somewhat bemused by the article. Why? Well when DF said he was
going
> > to do the testing, he siad he was only going to change the rod
> > stroke ratio
> > which meant only rods and pistons to keep compression heights
> > same ( I have
> > his email somewhere where he explained what was going to be done). So
once
> > again   a realistic test has morphed into something that masks the true
> > results. Because both the rod ratios and the bore were changed it is
> > impossible to determine the effect of either. Makes for good reading but
> > that's all. Nevertheless, it does point up that an engine is just an air
> > pump and however you get the max air in you make horsepower and torque.
> > Regards the article, if you revisit my web page, I said it didn't make
any
> > difference a long time ago
> >
> > mayf






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>